Search found 9 matches

by Michael
Wed 24 Apr 2019, 09:24
Forum: Feedback
Topic: Small improvements
Replies: 7
Views: 4531

Re: Small improvements

Hello Thorsten,

attached is an archive that contains the above-mentioned changes.
Only changed files are included.
It would be great if you can insert it into the official code.

Many thanks,
Michael
by Michael
Tue 02 Apr 2019, 12:27
Forum: Feedback
Topic: Small improvements
Replies: 7
Views: 4531

Re: Small improvements

Hello Thorsten, what I wanted to ask with all my proposals is essentially: Will you implement them into the official code? It's absolutely okay to say "no" or "sorry, no time at the moment" or something similar. I've just seen that the last update in github was several month ago. So I guess the proj...
by Michael
Mon 01 Apr 2019, 16:31
Forum: Usage
Topic: OpenEMS multi-processor performance
Replies: 20
Views: 19286

Re: OpenEMS multi-processor performance

Hello Thorsten, this discussion has become somewhat diffusing, so I'm not sure if I understand it corretly. I like to help speeding up the simulation engine, but it sounds that OpenEMS is not ready for this. To my opinion OpenEMS has already all necessary features available. (Why is it still version...
by Michael
Mon 01 Apr 2019, 15:45
Forum: Development
Topic: work areas, desirable features
Replies: 24
Views: 23977

Re: work areas, desirable features

Okay, now I beginning to understand what you really need. You're right that's problem.

Do you want to implement the changes for MSVC support nonetheless?

Are you interested in reducing the need for external dependencies?
E.g. I think "boost" can be replaced quite easily.
by Michael
Mon 01 Apr 2019, 15:36
Forum: Feedback
Topic: Small improvements
Replies: 7
Views: 4531

Re: Small improvements

Hello Thorsten, yes, of course, github is better suited for changes. Anyway, before spending a lot of time with all these things, I just want to learn how things go here, whether you agree to my changes, if we have the same opinion, what are the time scales etc. (Let me know when I'm too annoying, b...
by Michael
Fri 29 Mar 2019, 19:47
Forum: Development
Topic: work areas, desirable features
Replies: 24
Views: 23977

Re: work areas, desirable features

I currently don't have access to MSVC 2015, but will try to get it.
I think if the program compiles with MSVC 2010, the step to MSVC 2015 should be a small one.
I will gather the changes that are needed for this and come back to you.

Have a nice weekend,
Michael
by Michael
Fri 29 Mar 2019, 19:40
Forum: Feedback
Topic: Small improvements
Replies: 7
Views: 4531

Re: Small improvements

Hello Thorsten, wow, that's what I call a fast response! Unfortunately, I've no experience at all with git, github etc. I guess I have to register somewhere again. :( I'm somewhat reluctant doing this so often. But of course, the forum is not the place for bigger changes. I'm sure we will find a sol...
by Michael
Fri 29 Mar 2019, 19:13
Forum: Development
Topic: work areas, desirable features
Replies: 24
Views: 23977

Re: work areas, desirable features

... I fear that it will end in me having to compile everything using the MSVC... :cry: Any help in this area would be appreciated... I have no knowledge about Python and the other things you were talking about, but I can help in getting OpenEMS ready to compile with MSVC2010 using qmake. I had alre...
by Michael
Fri 29 Mar 2019, 18:54
Forum: Feedback
Topic: Small improvements
Replies: 7
Views: 4531

Small improvements

Hallo Thorsten, first of all many thanks and a big praise for the OpenEMS project! Really fantastic indeed. I will use it for simulating PCBs. I want to help improving the program and had a look into the code. Below are the first things that I found. It would be very nice if you consider them. Indee...